Showing posts with label mccain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mccain. Show all posts

2008-09-14

Another Palin Explanation

I think that people are finally getting the idea: a McCain presidency is basically just a Palin presidency in disguise... and a Palin presidency is just the neo-conservative arm of the Republican party running the country for 4 (or 8) more years. Frank Rich (New York Times Op-Ed Columnist) just wrote a blistering piece about what a Palin vice presidency would mean for the United States and how absurd it is that we are actually considering her as a vice presidential candidate at all.
First, he dismantled her RNC nomination speech, pointing out that, not only did she quote her unidentified writer out of context, the unidentified writer was Westbrook Pegler, "a rabid Joe McCarthyite who loathed F.D.R. and Ike and tirelessly advanced the theory that American Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe (“geese,” he called them) were all likely Communists."
Some other choice quotes follow:
"But race is just one manifestation of the emotion that defined the Palin rollout. That dominant emotion is fear — an abject fear of change. Fear of a demographical revolution that will put whites in the American minority by 2042. Fear of the technological revolution and globalization that have gutted those small towns and factories Palin apotheosized... And, last but hardly least, fear of illegal immigrants who do the low-paying jobs that Americans don’t want to do and of legal immigrants who do the high-paying jobs that poorly educated Americans are not qualified to do. No less revealing than Palin’s convention invocation of Pegler was the pointed omission of any mention of immigration, once the hottest Republican issue, by either her or McCain. Saying the word would have cued an eruption of immigrant-bashing ugliness, Pegler-style, before a national television audience."
"But the ultimate hypocrisy is that these woebegone, frightened opponents of change, sworn enemies of race-based college-admission initiatives, are now demanding their own affirmative action program for white folks applying to the electoral college. They want the bar for admission to the White House to be placed so low that legitimate scrutiny and criticism of Palin’s qualifications, record and family values can all be placed off limits. Byron York of National Review, a rare conservative who acknowledges the double standard, captured it best: “If the Obamas had a 17-year-old daughter who was unmarried and pregnant by a tough-talking black kid, my guess is if they all appeared onstage at a Democratic convention and the delegates were cheering wildly, a number of conservatives might be discussing the issue of dysfunctional black families.”"
In the end, Rich also provides some solid advice for Obama: "If Obama is to convey just what’s at stake, he must slice through the campaign’s lipstick jungle and show Americans the real perils that lie around the bend." Really good op-ed, I think. And one that, again, reminds Americans that a Palin vice presidency (actually, a Palin presidency) is NOT the option we want...

[via NYT]

Palin Exposé

After seeing that McCain went ahead of Obama very soon after the Palin addition, I have decided to actively use this post to help people understand that Palin is not a good running mate for anyone (even a Republican candidate). Of course, this is probably sort of like preaching to the choir (or so I sincerely hope), but I am going to do it anyway, just in case there is somebody who reads this who thought Palin is a worthy candidate for VP.
Starting off in that vein, it seems that the New York Times has made that objective of mine far easier. They ran a pretty long exposé of Palin's mayoral and gubernatorial campaigns and administrations in the Politics section of today's newspaper. It highlights all sorts of fun facts about her "leadership" style: ruthless vindictiveness, over-the-top cronyism, secrecy in place of the campaigned-on openness, and a general disinterest in running a government to serve all the people rather than just her own people. I've linked the article below, enjoy. And please, if you know people who think Palin is a good addition to the McCain ticket, use the article's points to convince them otherwise; just don't tell them it came from the New York Times as that will probably convince them that the "damn liberal media" is just out to get the best VP candidate ever... Ugh.

[via NYT]

2008-09-12

McCain leading Obama?!?!

I was reading election information yesterday at some of the more reliable sources of polling information available on the internet: Princeton Election Consortium and InTrade Prediction Markets. I found out that Obama has actually fallen behind McCain in state polls and in InTrade predictions! This after McCain selected Palin as his VP!!! In case this is all because of my transcript of her RNC speech, I would like to clarify that I was being satirical in every instance where I seemed to be praising her. Do NOT vote for McCain and her based on my transcript. If McCain-Palin really win this election, I ... Actually, I have no idea what I'll do as I never really thought I would have to consider that outcome. Thank you very much everyone who apparently thinks that the McCain ticket is somehow better thanks to Palin's new vice presidential nomination...

2008-08-14

McCain's Real Alternative Energy Policy

I know everyone who's been watching the Olympics in the US has seen the McCain ads about how he's really strongly in favor of alternative energy and energy independence. Here is the truth:
"It was only five days earlier, on July 30, that the Senate was voting for the eighth time in the past year on a broad, vitally important bill — S. 3335 — that would have extended the investment tax credits for installing solar energy and the production tax credits for building wind turbines and other energy-efficiency systems. ...

"Senator McCain did not show up for the crucial vote on July 30, and the renewable energy bill was defeated for the eighth time. In fact, John McCain has a perfect record on this renewable energy legislation. He has missed all eight votes over the last year — which effectively counts as a no vote each time. Once, he was even in the Senate and wouldn’t leave his office to vote.
I guess all those wind-turbine commercials on TV are supposed to replace the votes he should have been casting in favor of renewable energy investment tax credits.

[via NYT]